We’ve all been there, working on a paper, presentation or a report and wondering if it is appropriate to get help from an AI tool, like ChatGPT. One question people have is if they do decide to use it is, how to cite ChatGPT? Because so many people have asked questions about citing this generative AI tool, it’s become one of the more common things that people wonder about.
The process on how to cite ChatGPT can vary though depending on the scenario. Giving this large language model credit might depend on whether you’re working in an academic, business or some other context. The short answer, though, is “Yes”.
Table of Contents:
- Why Citing ChatGPT is Important
- Understanding Citation Styles
- When to Cite ChatGPT In Your Project
- How to Cite ChatGPT In APA Style
- How to Cite ChatGPT in Chicago Style
- How To Cite ChatGPT With MLA Styling
- Using ChatGPT Content
- Mistakes to Avoid When Citing ChatGPT
- Best Practice for Referencing
- Conclusion
Why Citing ChatGPT is Important
Proper citation is standard practice for several very practical and good reasons. You’re giving credit where it’s due. Citing acknowledges where the ideas came from.
You’re allowing others to follow your steps. This transparency gives readers context on how you reached the result you did.
Avoiding Plagiarism
You’re helping avoid plagiarism concerns. Being clear that some parts weren’t your own original thinking, even in business writing, prevents concerns about taking credit.
With traceability, readers can see how the responses may evolve or might vary if given at a later time, due to training.
How it Builds Trust With Readers
Openness about usage builds confidence with an audience. People seeing a responsible approach see a real interest in maintaining academic integrity even in using newer technological help.
Many universities recognize that students could try to be dishonest when it comes to using tools like ChatGPT. According to a recent study, 51% of students surveyed said using AI tools to complete assignments is considered cheating.
Understanding Citation Styles
Citations follow distinct forms. The particulars change depending on the situation or professional writing guidance that’s called for. There are often certain required components.
The general details can include showing the “who, when, what, where” about the AI tool. But, details could depend based on following well-known styles for sharing work.
APA Style (American Psychological Association)
This arrangement tends to focus on the author and the year of access. In 2029, the American Psychological Association first created APA as guidance for those in the sciences.
Here you’ll give OpenAI, credit as the ‘author’. Next share the access date in an in-text form, according to the APA Style website.
MLA Style (Modern Language Association)
This centers on the author too. You should still credit OpenAI.
But in this case, there’s added consideration for where text came from. There might be added details like sharing any prompting to the tool, according to the MLA Style website.
Chicago Style
This offers the choice of using footnote details, or an in-text display with date. When attributing ChatGPT, Chicago formatting can share more info as notes, or it could go within a reference list section, per Chicago Manual of Style.
Here, a lot is dependent on where information appears. You’ll either credit right in a Chicago footnote or put it on your references list page.
IEEE Style (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers)
Used commonly in tech fields, this utilizes numbered listings reflecting when shown in a paper. IEEE guidance is still evolving, as AI impacts the future of technical writing more and more.
You can add to the count of source details when needing to cite an AI assist here.
When to Cite ChatGPT In Your Project
Deciding whether or not it is important to mention the role a tool, like ChatGPT, played comes down to certain simple elements. Many times citing comes up when addressing concerns around credibility.
Knowing there is a source that’s non-human might be necessary. Here are the scenarios to cite this work:
Using Direct Responses
If you take complete segments of phrasing and insert them into your work. Sharing the source shows that the words originated somewhere else.
Let’s say that an AI-response was used in building a portion of the coding for an app development effort. The proper citation clearly documents this usage, even if the contribution isn’t shown to end users.
Shaping of General Direction
If a conversation steered the way ideas evolved, that’s when referencing usage may matter. You aren’t necessarily directly quoting text.
This could resemble citing a brainstorming session with others.
Technical Writing Support
Help with coding and tech insights, and in similar technical usage is when acknowledging comes up. These responses could matter if you incorporate technical direction within your final document.
There’s transparency needed often for numbers-oriented writing when origin of key figures matters.
AI for Information Gathering
In acting similar to an internet resource or some academic dataset, giving citation helps. Even this generative large language model is filling some information gaps.
So, functioning in that research collection effort warrants sharing its input. It’s really only responsible for its information it gathered prior to 2021.
Guidelines Dictating Credit
Formal learning spaces might share specific views on crediting these newer generative tools. Being open helps transparency.
Follow closely any specific required standards in your situation.
How to Cite ChatGPT In APA Style
The American Psychological Association considers outputting text like providing something “in person” rather than pulling information that many could go find on their own later.
The specifics depend on the purpose or audience seeing content produced using assistance.
In-Text Form Example
Using APA format, show “OpenAI” for the creator, then the year of your dialogue, with that info in parenthesis.
“(OpenAI, 2023)” shows immediately there was an interaction with the AI model. Use this APA in-text form where material provided by the large language model is found.
Citing in Your References
Typical guidance advises not adding a language model to any reference list following an “in text” usage.
However when working from content created by OpenAI online, start by putting OpenAI, then after put (Year). Add the source content’s headline using italics, then put something such as ‘Large language model’. Finally add a full link address.
General APA Format Tips
The formatting here follows many of the ways of organizing other cited written research pieces. A section towards the conclusion covers your references.
Any references included within a document appear listed on a fresh page. Put this section detailing the resources and credit them after any conclusion content.
How to Cite ChatGPT in Chicago Style
Showing usage using Chicago style often centers on where an acknowledgment fits. With this styling, writers get two methods to reference sources.
They include “Notes and Bibliography” and “Author-Date.”
Using Notes, Footnotes
Because pulling these AI-provided responses can only be done individually, Chicago Styling is used typically only on notes at bottoms of pages.
So putting something there looks like: OpenAI, ChatGPT, replying after prompting by Name Here, February, 29, 2024.
Example Author-Date in Text
Pulling official info straight from OpenAI could show similarly to APA standards. No noting that something’s coming from an AI-resource is called for.
A title of a piece with dates and address appears only.
Layout on Page
Chicago format shares all resourcing information shown on separate reference lists, with title “Bibliography,” coming on final portions.
That final page area is when someone can learn more about content origin. All of these areas give chances for more context.
How To Cite ChatGPT With MLA Styling
Handling of produced-text with MLA style works a little different. This referencing looks at output also like something that’s personal because responses given only can only be had one way and privately.
Think in person here, similar to a speaker being shown talking but there’s nothing more public viewers are able to look over on their own after.
Using an In-Text Citation Example
Simpler form tends to show an author/creator only. There won’t be numbers of pages coming from AI because there isn’t a longer work as the origin.
An Example using this is “(OpenAI)”.
Listing as ‘Works Cited’ Item
Start with author details being OpenAI, then the main phrasing in italics, followed next with dates/timeframe, the developing organization. Finish the listing putting addresses minus anything including the standard https:// portion.
The section, “Works Cited” pages holds more for reader direction for reviewing.
Typical MLA Formatting
On those “Works Cited” at conclusion areas put complete citing for things, where viewers go. Every item listed follows an alphabetized display
Those listings have complete details helping someone to locate your original work and check what supports claims shared.
Using ChatGPT Content
You might have a real burning desire of copying over segments straight out of the tool.
Direct quote copying looks like you put those texts with marks signaling verbatim. This comes with immediate source indication to add trust.
Changing slightly keeps main sentiment but, you are making slight alteration in how details reach readers. Using these new sentences and wording may help get text that sounds non robotic.
Even rewording by you though requires giving ChatGPT source mentioning. It’s not your fresh view and the tool aided the idea formation.
Complete Reproducing
Sharing very lengthy text segments, entire multiple sentence chunks, still call out the AI origination clearly and upfront. Either do so as large visually set-aside chunks, or place clearly in among more personalized text but again making where all parts are sourced from known up front
These actions make source clearer right away.
Organizing these ideas pulled helps organize things easier later if redoing prompts too. There might exist the ability for pulling this info more broadly.
Mistakes to Avoid When Citing ChatGPT
Mistakes during usage of ChatGPT when working and generating texts damage trust in the final content shared. Doing appropriate referencing builds confidence.
Being clear and ethical about what you’re doing makes sharing more reliable. Be extra careful about these common concerns:
Giving ChatGPT Human Qualities
AI assistants shouldn’t take on roles as personal expertise resources because, for many cases, that’s a status beyond these machine learning assistants. Thinking ChatGPT’s writing compares similarly as those prepared following many researchers going though reviewing formally isn’t quite reasonable.
AI generated language requires referencing those technological origins openly.
Missing Version Updates/Access Times
Model updates could potentially bring forth a shifting of answers or recommendations, as these things learn more or might process different input later on. The timing you see something could possibly lead responses varying a bit later in other prompts by others. Always showing when helps bring added clarity.
Someone seeing an exchange even hours after the question’s delivery potentially finds altered results. The audience benefits knowing this exchange has unique context in time.
Relying Entirely Without Own Checking
AI can produce outdated and occasionally just incorrect outputs. Relying completely without verification risks distributing incorrect items to your readers.
Check figures always that a tool offers using other better accepted resources if appropriate and possible before accepting it as ready to use.
Confusing Your Thoughts vs AI Ideas
AI aiding doesn’t completely relieve needs or show proper author sourcing properly. Mixing up thinking origins between you versus technology helps create questions potentially.
Clearly differentiate all text. Always signal assistance by using distinct formatting on those contributions by machines during your drafts .
Best Practice for Referencing
Knowing any unique directions specific by education groups matters when learning proper crediting, so look for policies if unsure.
Follow and abide by institution instructions regarding acknowledgement because directions for documenting ChatGPT’s input use could come in different approaches, each being institution dependent .
Showing AI Usage Context
Explaining methods improves understanding where AI influenced development on some thing. Explaining reasons help offer needed clarifying in situations.
Here’s two options including summarizing, shaping details, finding support: ChatGPT aided in making starting summarization and shaping original argumentation; ChatGPT offered information sources that proved effective.
Always use the tool appropriately. The tools helps writing assistance rather replacing AI writing process fully with technology assistance only. .
Checking Reliability and Relevancy
Cross validation proves necessary still during preparing when working for correctness given ChatGPT’s occasional misstating possibilities. Fact verification strengthens projects immensely in the longer view, and it offers added legitimacy in presentation or during submissions ultimately to show quality effort applied too.
Cite when responses align when they are used.
Mentioning Versions Used, Too
These newer models like GPT continue adapting given further ongoing developer upgrades occurring at rapid paces, therefore responses may indeed keep evolving from moment of input in different phases later.
Putting GPT number along helps improve credibility more fully too and give added context with noting specifics as seen using “Model 3.5”. Always use reliable outside references rather trying using responses for external materials, to keep away from errors that might crop up in referencing.
Be upfront. When institution requirements specify something with mentioning using OpenAI tools put these items properly when appropriate on section.
Conclusion
AI offers great help for numerous needs as its being discovered currently. It’s opening exciting avenues for writers in ways previously unthinkable. The current AI tools help assist a writing session when drafting, summarizing and so many more things.
With many tools still quickly growing including large language, being up to date with using everything available helps writers significantly. Learning about how to cite ChatGPT matters when considering where this model has input as this avoids accidentally taking responsibility inappropriately.
These technologies enable working rapidly but, referencing and transparency need constant applying to make your presentation have more impact.
Scale growth with AI! Get my bestselling book, Lean AI, today!
