In startups and entrepreneurship, venture capital (VC) funding plays a crucial role in scaling businesses, providing the necessary fuel to take innovative ideas to new heights. However, securing VC funding has long been a challenge for women founders.
Despite strides toward gender equality in various sectors, women face significant barriers when seeking startup investments. A study co-authored by Yale SOM’s Heather Tookes sheds light on why it’s harder for women to secure venture capital, even when their business performance matches that of their male counterparts.
The Persistent Gender Gap in Venture Capital
The study reveals a striking gender disparity in venture capital funding. Women represent only 16% of first-time VC-backed entrepreneurs. This number dwindles further with each subsequent attempt, with only 9% of women securing funding for a second venture and a mere 4% starting three or more VC-backed businesses. These statistics clearly show how women founders struggle to get their fair share of the venture capital pie, even after proving themselves as capable entrepreneurs.
Failure Isn’t Equal in Venture Capital
Failure is a common part of the entrepreneurial journey. Most venture-backed startups do not result in successful exits; investors expect to encounter portfolio failures. However, the study highlights that failure has different consequences for women and men. If an investor experiences a poor outcome from a woman-led startup, they are significantly less likely to invest in another woman-led venture. Conversely, the successes of women founders do not lead to an increase in future investments for women-led businesses. This “one-way updating” phenomenon reflects a bias where failure by women founders is disproportionately penalized.
Why Investors Shy Away from Women Founders
Both demand-side and supply-side factors contribute to the gender gap in VC funding. On the demand side, women founders may be less likely to pursue second ventures. The study shows that women are 30% less likely to raise venture capital for a second business after a failure and 18% less likely after a success. However, this doesn’t fully explain the disparity, as even women who actively seek funding face more obstacles than their male counterparts.
On the supply side, investor behavior plays a significant role. Investors who have experienced a failure from a woman-led startup are less likely to invest in another women-founded venture within the next five years. This creates a cycle where women founders are systematically overlooked, not because of their abilities or business potential, but due to a bias rooted in past experiences.
Stereotypes and Biases at Play
The study’s findings suggest that gender stereotypes and biases are deeply ingrained in the venture capital landscape. Investors often view men and women differently, even with similar entrepreneurial histories. These biases are not always conscious, but they have real consequences, limiting the opportunities available to women founders.
One striking example is investors’ tendency to generalize negative outcomes from one woman-led business to others. Just as in medicine—where a study found that physicians are less likely to refer patients to women surgeons after a poor outcome with another female surgeon—investors appear to penalize all women founders for the failure of one woman-led startup.
The Cost of Overlooking Women Founders
From a financial perspective, gender bias in venture capital funding isn’t just unfair—it’s also unwise. Years of research show that entrepreneurs who make multiple attempts at building businesses are more likely to succeed in the long run. By excluding women from subsequent funding rounds, investors may miss lucrative opportunities.
Women founders denied a “second bite at the apple,” representing a significant untapped potential. Venture capital firms that recognize and address the biases in their investment strategies could reap substantial rewards by targeting this overlooked group of experienced entrepreneurs.
Addressing the Gender Gap: Steps for Investors
So, how can the venture capital community address these biases and create a more equitable landscape for women founders? Here are a few strategies:
- Awareness and Education: Investors need to know their biases and how they affect their decision-making. By recognizing the patterns of “one-way updating” and other forms of bias, investors can make more objective decisions based on merit rather than stereotypes.
- Tracking Data and Setting Benchmarks: Venture capital firms should track the gender breakdown of their investments and set benchmarks for improving gender diversity in their portfolios. By holding themselves accountable, they can ensure that women founders are given equal consideration.
- Diversifying Investment Teams: Research shows that diverse teams make better decisions. By increasing the number of women in investment decision-making roles, venture capital firms can reduce the likelihood of biased investment patterns.
- Investing in Women-Led Funds: Another way to address the gender gap is to invest in women-led venture capital funds. These funds often better understand the unique challenges women founders face and are more likely to invest in women-led startups.
The Future of Venture Capital for Women Founders
The findings from the Yale study highlight the systemic barriers women founders face in securing venture capital funding. They also offer a roadmap for how the venture capital community can move forward. By recognizing and addressing the biases in their investment strategies, venture capitalists have the opportunity to not only create a more equitable funding environment but also capitalize on the untapped potential of women entrepreneurs.
Securing venture capital may be more challenging for women founders, but the tide is slowly turning. As more research illuminates the system’s biases and more investors recognize the financial benefits of supporting diverse founders, we can hope for a future where women entrepreneurs have equal access to the resources they need to build successful businesses.
Conclusion
Men have long dominated the venture capital world, and women founders continue to face significant hurdles in securing funding. However, as this study shows, the issue isn’t competence or business acumen—it’s bias and outdated stereotypes. The challenge for the venture capital community is clear: overcome these biases and create a more inclusive environment for all founders. By doing so, they promote fairness and unlock new opportunities for innovation and financial success.
In the end, investing in women founders is not just about doing the right thing—it’s about making smart business decisions. Investors who take the initiative to address these disparities will be well-positioned to lead the next wave of innovation and entrepreneurship.
Subscribe to my LEAN 360 newsletter to learn more about startup insights.
